The Computer Oracle

How to install software packages on a Mac? (MacPorts, Fink, anything better?)

--------------------------------------------------
Hire the world's top talent on demand or became one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
and get $2,000 discount on your first invoice
--------------------------------------------------

Take control of your privacy with Proton's trusted, Swiss-based, secure services.
Choose what you need and safeguard your digital life:
Mail: https://go.getproton.me/SH1CU
VPN: https://go.getproton.me/SH1DI
Password Manager: https://go.getproton.me/SH1DJ
Drive: https://go.getproton.me/SH1CT


Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Future Grid Looping

--

Chapters
00:00 How To Install Software Packages On A Mac? (Macports, Fink, Anything Better?)
00:40 Answer 1 Score 14
01:08 Accepted Answer Score 27
02:20 Answer 3 Score 4
02:39 Answer 4 Score 4
03:09 Thank you

--

Full question
https://superuser.com/questions/28529/ho...

--

Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...

--

Tags
#macos #packagemanagement #macports #fink #homebrew

#avk47


ACCEPTED ANSWER

Score 27


I used to use Macports because:

  • It is generally more up to date
  • Macports seems to be more common / popular
  • Everyone else I work with uses it

When I did my own research on this topic when I got my MBP last fall, Macports seemed to be most commonly recommended for reason #1 above, hence reason #2 (and probably reason #3).

Compiling every package doesn't bother me. It is usually fast enough that it doesn't interfere with work. But you might look into port binaries if you're going to use macports.

However, I quit using Macports.

There is also a new tool in this space called Homebrew. I switched from Macports to Homebrew a few weeks ago and I'm pleased as punch. I like:

  • It doesn't install duplicate libraries - it uses the system's existing libs.
  • It installs in the user home directory - no sudo required and backs up to TimeMachine.

Homebrew works on Leopard or Snow Leopard, though sometimes Formulas need to be modified on Leopard.

I think all my coworkers have now switched to Homebrew. It is also gaining traction in the Ruby and Erlang (and possibly other OSS?) communities.



ANSWER 2

Score 14


You don't have to pick between the two.

MacPorts installs software to /opt/local. Fink installs to /sw.

Both leave the Darwin base system untouched, and the two can co-exist peacefully.

Fink's binary packages are great, but they aren't always up-to-date. I tend to use Fink when they've got an up-to-date package, and I build from MacPorts if they don't.

Some packages are only on one or the other, so it's handy to have them both at the ready.



ANSWER 3

Score 4


Fink partisan here, because

  • The packages of interest to particle physicists (like me!) are very up-to-date
  • I use debian on my linux boxes. The fink command line is a lot like aptitude, and I'm used to the dpkg underpinnings


ANSWER 4

Score 4


If you only install a few programs, anything (fink, macports, homebrew) will be fine.

But if you are a heavy user, I think only macports is suitable. fink's package is a bit too old. homebrew is a too young project.

Also, recently I've heard someone using pkgsrc on mac os x. And I may give pkgsrc a try. (I am using macports now, and have 418 ports installed currently.)