Alternative to the tee command without STDOUT
Rise to the top 3% as a developer or hire one of them at Toptal: https://topt.al/25cXVn
--------------------------------------------------
Music by Eric Matyas
https://www.soundimage.org
Track title: Horror Game Menu Looping
--
Chapters
00:00 Alternative To The Tee Command Without Stdout
00:45 Accepted Answer Score 41
01:01 Answer 2 Score 19
01:39 Answer 3 Score 6
02:11 Answer 4 Score 6
02:44 Answer 5 Score 1
02:59 Thank you
--
Full question
https://superuser.com/questions/504343/a...
--
Content licensed under CC BY-SA
https://meta.stackexchange.com/help/lice...
--
Tags
#linux #commandline #posix #tee
#avk47
ACCEPTED ANSWER
Score 41
Another option that avoids piping the stuff back and then to /dev/zero
is
sudo command | sudo dd of=FILENAME
ANSWER 2
Score 19
The dd
solution still prints junk to stderr:
$ ls | sudo dd of=FILENAME
0+1 records in
0+1 records out
459 bytes (459 B) copied, 8.2492e-05 s, 5.6 MB/s
That can be avoided using the status
option:
command | sudo dd status=none of=FILENAME
Another interesting possibility (for Linux anyway):
command | sudo cp /dev/stdin FILENAME
To copy TTY input into a file, I often do this:
sudo cp /dev/tty FILENAME
It's too bad tee doesn't have an option to suppress stdout.
ANSWER 3
Score 6
You could use a script. I.e. put something like this in i.e. $HOME/bin/stee
, 0tee
or similar:
#!/bin/bash
argv=
while [[ "$1" =~ ^- ]]; do
argv+=" $1"
shift
done
sudo tee $argv "$1" > /dev/null
#!/bin/bash
sudo tee "$@" > /dev/null
Make it executeable:
$ chmod 755 stee
Now do i.e.:
$ ls -la | stee -a /root/foo
ANSWER 4
Score 6
I would add a sponge
as an alternative.
On Ubuntu or other Debian based distributions, you can install it with sudo apt install -y moreutils
Please note that there are some differences compared to tee
about which you can read more here and here
Unlike a shell redirect, sponge soaks up all its input before writing the output file. This allows constructing pipelines that read from and write to the same file.
This difference is actually an advantage for my typical use cases.
ANSWER 5
Score 1
You can wrap your whole command into sudo, so the shell itself, as well as redirects, are performed as root
:
sudo sh -c 'do_something > FILENAME'